A professional 'modernist'

[Ansari]

:salam:

A modernist that declares sahih hadith weak 'scientifically'. His name is Dr. Ahmad Shafaat. He's also mentioned on these sites:
http://www.livingislam.org/o/lcit_e.html
http://muslim-canada.org/finance.html

His claims about rajm:
http://www.************************/Stoning.htm
http://www.************************/Stoning3.htm

He says the science of hadith needs to be developed more and has to be more 'accurate': http://www.************************/AhadithForIslamicDates.htm

This is his site: http://www.************************/default.htm


While the Qur`an made a tremendous advance forward over the pre-Islamic traditions and cultures, these Muslims moved backward, trying even to pull Islam down with them by distorting and fabricating traditions about the stoning “verse”, death penalty for unnatural sex, and stories about stoning of adulterers and adulteresses done by the Prophet. What is even more unfortunate is that they managed to circulate so many of these false ahadith that in the subsequent generations most Muslims were unable to free themselves from them.

http://www.************************/Stoning4.htm

What do you people think about it?

[ridhwan]

What do you people think ..?

He's a Hadith Rejector, offspring of Ghulam Ahmed Parwez & Co. and thus should be meted out the punishment of an apostate (obviously he would deny that too)

[Muawiyah]

Some Muslims take everything in their favorite collections of hadith such as Bukhari or Muslim as entirely authentic. But even though some collections may be more reliable (e.g., the ones that have come to us in tawattur - continuity) than others, there are none that are completely free of forged traditions.

hosting a pervezi's article coz he defends Milad. very bad