Blog Comments

I have much to learn
for reply.

Masha`Allah

May ALLAH grant success ... in both worlds.

Indeed Only the people of intellect take head.

Originally Posted by 'Abdullaah

Sheikh Abuhajira for the beneficial entry.

Could you write a "simply explained" article, similar to above, on the reality that hadith being saheeh does not equal to being it a definite proof (qat'i). This is a misconception that many have, who believe that all of Qur'an is proof in the definite sense, and all of sahih hadeeth are also proof in definite sense.

Wassalamu alaikum

Oh my. Jazak Allah for your duas.

The article is actually by my teacher Ml. Muhammad Saheb who is Sheikhul Hadeeth of Madrasah Camperdown. I am sure you know him.

I will relay your message and hope he will write something on those lines, unless he has already written some.

Sheikh Abuhajira for the beneficial entry.

Could you write a "simply explained" article, similar to above, on the reality that hadith being saheeh does not equal to being it a definite proof (qat'i). This is a misconception that many have, who believe that all of Qur'an is proof in the definite sense, and all of sahih hadeeth are also proof in definite sense.

Right to the point, as always
for the article

first dua:

Alhamdu lilla hillazee ahyana ba'da maa amaatana wa ilayhin nashoor

second dua:

Allahumma bka asbahna wa bika amsayna wa bika nahyaa wa bika namootu, wa ilaykan nashoor

I will also add to the original post

Originally Posted by EhtYlno

Sorry for the really basic question, but Ghusl enough for Salaah?
Or do you need the complete Wudhu for Salaah?

Ghusl is superior purification than wudhu. So if you have ghusl, then you do not need wudhu to pray your salah.

Sorry for the really basic question, but Ghusl enough for Salaah?
Or do you need the complete Wudhu for Salaah?

Can you put it in English transliteration????????????????

Like how would you put it in English words like Bismillah

[offtopic] Hadhrat what does this mean...

Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Had it not been for Eve, woman would have never acted unfaithfully towards her husband.
(muslim)

Mufti sahib, since many people [even from among the ahnaf] are unaware of this mas'alah, and were mislead by the salafi's, it leads me to a question: Hypothetically, if a person had prayed many past salahs having done masah on cotton socks, and then later he found out this is not valid, is it permissible for him to take rukhsa and adopt the Hanbali position for those instances? This way he will not have to repeat those salahs. Would this be talfiq?

Originally Posted by Maria al-Qibtiyya

No one answered my queries.

Do you know, on the day of Qayamah knowledgeable people will be questioned for their knowledge. It's their obligation to enlighten the ignorant ones.
l will complain & will tell Allah on the day of Qayamah that your knowledgeable people were not answering my queries & Allah will ask you all for that. Now I should be off hunh! bye.

My apologies. I'll attempt to answer your query, Mufti sahib may correct any mistakes .

Hanafi's, Maliki's and Shafii's are all of the opinion that wiping on normal cotton socks is not permissible. The wudhu of the person who does this is not valid, and therefore his salah is not valid. Only the Hanbali madhab gives some leeway in this regard and see's it as permissible. However, I think even in the Hanbali madhab there is a second opinion that it is impermissible [Im not sure about this so Mufti sahib can confirm ].

The socks should be leather for masah.

No one answered my queries.

Do you know, on the day of Qayamah knowledgeable people will be questioned for their knowledge. It's their obligation to enlighten the ignorant ones.
l will complain & will tell Allah on the day of Qayamah that your knowledgeable people were not answering my queries & Allah will ask you all for that. Now I should be off hunh! bye.

Okay...

for replying.

Originally Posted by abuhajira

The salah behind an imam who makes masah on normal socks is not valid. However, such should be known about the Imam that he made masah on the socks. If it is a doubt that since Imam is from middle ease, most probably he did masah, then that is only a doubt, not sufficient to render the salah invalid.

This is Hanafi view on this that one should not do Masah over normal socks. Right.
So can you please tell me what are the views of rest of imams?

Moreover, one should make effort and let the imam know in a very polite manner that there are people from other madhahib praying behind him,

Why? Reason? Let me know please.

Or tell me, what do you mean?

Originally Posted by FROMBANYADAM

WHY R YOU ASKING HANAFY FATWA WHEN YOU ARE A WAHABY? IS THAT NOT NIFAAQ?

So finally banyadams have recognised that dhobi is a munafiq.

Originally Posted by Dhobi

is there any concrete evidence that masah on normal socks is not valid which can be shown to such people (mainly the followers of sk. bin baaz ra)? or is it a fiqhi dispute?

heared somewhere that its allowed by the sk baaz ra. not sure though.

WHY R YOU ASKING HANAFY FATWA WHEN YOU ARE A WAHABY? IS THAT NOT NIFAAQ?

mufti sahib,

Just to keep an healthy atmosphere can we allow a gair muqllaid to lead the prayers (in office)

a bearded person pprayed behind a trimmed one in a huge jamaah.
after salah he realised that he was trimmed & planned to repeat the salah after people disperse.

after avery one went, another person came. so this bearded one, lead the jamah with him.
now,
1. is the 2nd salah of that bearded one valid??
2. if not, will the 2nd person's salah praying behind the bearded one will also be invalidated??