Search:

:salam:

Sister, first you have to determine if it was just a promise or an actual Oath. They are two different things.

Please read: http://islamqa.org/hanafi/seekersguidance-hanafi/32833
...

Sister, just because he is on youtube does not mean he is a scholar. Same goes for Zakir Naik, he is good at giving da'wah to non-Muslims. But when it comes to sacred knowledge, he is not reliable. ...

He's not a scholar, nor does he claim to be one. But he gives beneficial talks, especially for young Muslims, or those who are newly practicing.

Brilliance of the Book - Nouman Ali Khan

You should listen to his other lectures. He mostly focuses on the linguistic miracles and style of the Quran.

In particular, listen to is "Quran...

:salam:

You can't just offer salah behind him and then repeat it, because salah behind him is not valid anyway. It would be like you are "pretending" to pray. You'll have to either offer to lead...

1) No, you have to see him do it for that very salah. Unless you actually see it happen, you should assume that his wudhu was proper. This is why the 'ulema advise that when praying behind an imam of...

:alhamd:

This is why its always best to confirm with a mufti. Apologies for any confusion caused.

Men are supposed to keep their trousers above their ankles (i.e. their ankles should be showing). Women, however, need to cover their ankles.

The hadith only applies to men.

:ws:

Yes, but those ahadtih refer to leather socks. The OP is asking about regular cotton socks. Masah is permissible on the former, but not on the latter.

:ws:

Yes, its the same ruling for Question 1 for someone who follows another madhab or takes it to be permissible.

I haven't posted a ruling for Question 2, although (If the food he's eating...

:salam:

1) If you see him wiping the socks, you can't pray behind him. If you don't see him do this, you can assume that he did wudhu correctly and pray behind him.

2) Well is the food...

Lol, anytime bro!

All credit goes to Brother 'Abdullah, the maker of the site. May Allah reward him.

Yes it does, but I find Sahih International to be a better translation.

:inna:

May Allah curse the dog Assad and his army. May He put him into the Hellfire next to Fir'awn. Ameen.

:bism:

http://islamqa.org/shafii/qibla-shafii/33286

Walaikum assalam wa rahmatullah,

No, it is not compulsory, rather the raising of the hands and the supplication itself are recommended as...

Anwarul Bayan is another excellent tafseer.

:salam:

:bism:

Its best to read English translation alongside with a tafseer. For a good English translation, I would suggest Sahih International.

For a good Tafseer, I would definitely...

:salam:

:bism:

http://islamqa.org/shafii/qibla-shafii/33364

:salam:

Due to the difference of opinion, there is more taqwa in abstaining from them. But if you take the position of a Hanafi scholar who says its halal, then that is also perfectly fine.
...

:salam:

Sorry for the late reply, I completely forgot about this.

The following is taken from the English Translation of Maraqi al-Sa'adat (Ascent to Felicity) by Allama Abu 'l-Ikhlas...

How do you know that rejecting the Quran leads to Hellfire? Its the same principle.

No, there isn't. In fact, its common sense if you think about it.

Mutawatir ahadith are a qat'i source, rejecting anything qat'i is kufr. It would be on the same level as rejecting the Quran.

:salam:

So a Muslim is saying this? In that case, he has committed apostasy, and far from being attacked, he should rather be killed for such blasphemy. Wallahu A'lam.

Please read The Difference of the Imams By Shaykh Zakariyya Khandelvi :rahma:

You see, thats wrong. Its NOT a sunnah in the Hanafi Madhab.