Reply to the claims of "Abu Alqama" in his attacks on Malik al-Dar's narration

[Lahori12]

So nobdoy has the paper of Hussain Ahmad known as Abul Hassan, as told in the end of the paper.

I had a quick look at it some days ago, and now I wanted to read it so to answer it, and it does not work ?

So how can one answer when paper does not work ?

[faqir]

Well I'm glad you admitted you are the abualqama of ahya. I have just clicked on the pdf file. It works fine. I can re-attach it here if you like?

[Musleemah]

Lahori, whoever you are
You shouldn't be wasting your time replying to this file.. because it will be of no benefit. there is proof that Malik is known.

insha Allah soon there will be a thread discussing this narration and other narrations used as proof for tawassul that is asking the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم du'aa to Allah after his death.
And the point about Malik's "trustworthiness" will not be part of the discussion insha Allah.

So wait until the thread is started then you can decide what you should really concentrate on, and if any research regarding it is needed and on what points.

An advice from ur sister.

[Al-Burhan]

Lahori, whoever you are
You shouldn't be wasting your time replying to this file.. because it will be of no benefit. there is proof that Malik is known.

But we see here that this Abu Alqama (or Lahori12) is still not good enough to accept his mistake!!!