Assalamu Alaykum
Has the full version (the complete version) of the Musannaf of Abdul Razzaq Al-San'a3ni (may Allah have mercy on him) ever been published? or is a part of it lost in time?

Assalamu Alaykum
Has the full version (the complete version) of the Musannaf of Abdul Razzaq Al-San'a3ni (may Allah have mercy on him) ever been published? or is a part of it lost in time?

A small fragment of it is missing at the beginning. There is no sign of this portion anywhere in the world.

Are you sure about that ?
I saw a book in the personal Maktabah of Shaikh Talha Bilal Manyaar, a Khaas student of Abdul Fattah Abu Ghuddah called :
الجزء المفقود من المصنف لعبد الرزاق
It was a small booklet with Ahadith of Taharah in it, the Muhaqqiq said this was the part missing from the printed edition of the great Muhaddith Habibur Rahmaan Azmi RA.
وما من كاتب إلا سيفنـى
ويبقى الدهر ما كتبت يداه
فلا تكتب بخطك غير شئي
يسرك في القيامة أن تراه

That booklet is fabricated.
Some of our contemporary Ahl al-Bid'ah decided to revive the centuries-old practice of fabricating ahadith to prove their incorrect beliefs, so they contructed this "missing portion", full of ahadith that are open lies.
It is evident from the sentence construction of many of the so-called "ahadith", that the fabricator/s weren't even Arabs!
They managed to pull the wool over the eyes of some of the Arab Sufi's, who in their joy over finding such "proof", didn't scrutinize the manuscript properly and instead printed it as if it was really the missing portion.
This mammoth mistake, led to the Wahabis having a field day and will undoubtedly be ammunition for them for centuries to come, as proof of how the "Asharis" and "Sufis" resort to fabricating and lying in order to prove their beliefs.

Is it?
Well a photo copy of the booklet was in the shelf beside the Musannaf and I flipped through it, read a little of the Muhaqqiq's Muqaddamah, and a few of the Ahadith on Taharah, Wudhu to be precise.
There was a Hadith relating to Mash of the head. I was looking up the different wordings for the Ahadith that Imaam Laknawi RA mentioned in Dhafarul Amaani as daleel for Mash of the Raqabah. If am not mistaken I think the wording in this Juz was a little different, actually a little more clear in proving the Masah of the Raqabah. Wallahu Aalam. That book is faaaar away now.
وما من كاتب إلا سيفنـى
ويبقى الدهر ما كتبت يداه
فلا تكتب بخطك غير شئي
يسرك في القيامة أن تراه

Here is the riwayah:
150- حَدَّثَنَا حَفْصُ بْنُ غِيَاثٍ ، عَنْ لَيْثٍ ، عَنْ طَلْحَةَ ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ ، قَالَ : رَأَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم تَوَضَّأَ فَمَسَحَ رَأْسَهُ هَكَذَا ؛ وَأَمَرَّ حَفْصٌ بِيَدَيْهِ عَلَى رَأْسِهِ حَتَّى مَسَحَ قَفَاهُ.
They took it from the musannaf of Ibn Abi Shaibah and added it into the "Juz".
The sanad in the Juz goes as:
عبد الرزاق عن معمر عن ليث
I have uploaded three files concerning the Juz.
The first is a Salafi refutation of it,
the second the muhaqqiqs reply,
the third the Salafis follow up.
You can download them from here.


Yes, it is the same one.
The "missing portion" allegedly starts with Kitab al-Imam, under which there is only one chapter and that is regarding the creation of the Nur of Nabi
That is the chapter where they really had to use their imaginations, taking duas from Dalail al-Khairat etc and portraying them as ahadith, by giving them sahih chains and attributing them to Nabiand the Sahabah
.
18 "ahadith", all only regarding the Nur of Nabi![]()

I note that this issue has been put to rest here before:
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...6&postcount=18

Assalamoalykom.
One of my friend told me that Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanvi ( Rh) quoted the hadith of Jabir (rd) that the first creation was Noor of prophet in his book nashrutteeb fi zikril habeeb.
Could some one please tell me from where did he get this hadith?
Bookmarks