Im not sure what you are trying to achieve.
Do flick through all my threads to get a clearer picture rather than just picking up a few things to portray a certain impression.
Between the day I made my first and today, I have learnt a lot about the etiquette of Islmaic discussion.
I hope that shows in the later posts that you made.
This is a style I adopt. If you look carefully enough you dont neeed most of the teachings of these scholars to be able to present an argument towards Shiite beliefs.Quote:
Daraqutni, Tirmidhi, Bukhari, Qurtubi, Ibn Maeen, Dhahabi, Al-Hakim, Abu Zur`ah, Abu Hatim, Yahya bin Saeed, Albani, Yahya Bin Ma’een, Su’alat ibn, Tareekh Baghdad, Ahmad Bin Hanbal, Ibn Hibban, Ibn ’Adi, Al-Daraqutni, Ibn Tahir al-Maqdisi, Ibn Al-Arabi al Maliki, Ibn A’sakir, Ibn Al-Jawzi, Al-Nawawi, Al-Mizzi, Al Dhahabi
I have seen these names fly around over here.
Never heard of half of them.
Who are they and what do they do ? (Joke, just a quick explanation of their beliefs according to the sunnah)
All my other threads start off with a question as well, and I invite everone to answer and then try to make a conclusion. Flick through here to find fadak, the last sermon and many other threads I started for discussion not refutation.
To prove this point just read my thread on ghadeer which I am just updating. Obviously no one here was able to provide much info so all the input there is mine.
I like to ask a question and invite a discussion rather than dive in straight away. I hope you see that what you did is just portray an image of me that may not be true.