How to Compare Religions

[Ahmed Mohammad]

Asalam'ali'kum Dear Brothers and Sisters

How are you all?

I am a new member in the forum, and I wanted to share this manuscript with you. Its aim to assist how should an individual think about different beliefs…

How to Compare Religions

http://www.4shared.com/file/72764782...Religions.html

& in Arabic

كيف نـقارن بـين الأديان

http://www.4shared.com/file/72766329/322264fe/___.html


The cover page of the paper…

__________________________________________________ ___________

How to Compare Religions

Basic Principles of Logic
Among Philosophy Schools and Religions


The Purpose of This Manuscript:

The ideological conflicts between philosophy schools and religions have lately intensified, where each one of them claims its correctness, and also the fallacy of others. Among the professional debates (or arguments) based on evidence and justifications, there are biased arguments based on incorrect psychological and cognitive standards. Moreover, many people seem to be influenced by these incorrect standards that have caused them to be lost in these times, "the time tribulations". The aim of this manuscript is to comment on these standards and test their accuracy, and point to some of the issues related to the investigations between these ideological schools.

__________________________________________________ ____________

Please, feel free to share it with other friends, especially non-Muslims.. May Allah bless you all..

Wasalam'ali'kum wara'hma'to'Allah wabara'katoh

[chantelle.gray17]

jazak allah brother

[Ahmed Mohammad]

Asalam'alikum, you too brother

May Allah bless you my dear..

[not known]

that book is written by a shia

and it consists links to shias sites, where they try to explain shiism

[Ahmed Mohammad]

The concepts explained in the manuscript are very useful and applicable for all religions and schools. They can be easily used against non-Muslims, regarding proof of the existance of Allah (sup'hana'ho-wa'ta'ala) and how to think unbias about Islam.. especially toward the end of the paper, but still, the beginings are suplementary for the argument..

[not known]

yes it would be good if its about islam, but i think the links provided in the book just explains shi'ism