I have a honest question:
Is there anything in Islamic history/heritage where the scholars and leaders of Islam "adapted" themselves to the people in order to fill the masajid?
If one simply takes the scholars to represent Islam (scholars=Islam), then how can somebody claim that the scholars (i.e. Islam) has to be adapted in order to fill the masajid?
Isn't this problem with the "lost youth" a specific problem in areas where kufr and batil is wide-spread? So what about the thought that adapting the scholars to the whims of the youth just means to adapt Islam to the kufr and batil ideologies who are implanted in the youth and cause their disinteresst in religious topics, lectures etc.???
Furthermore what does "adapt" really imply?
Does it mean we play soccer with youth (with awrah exposed as everyone is in shorts above knees) and nobody even the so called "scholars" do NOT speak up against it?
Does it mean we shave the beard in order not to look as "terrorist" and frighten them?
Does it mean we hide away certain Islamic topics who might not please the audience? (e.g. Ruling about music, hudud for stealing/apostacy etc.)
Does it mean we even lie to the audience? (e.g. saying music with instruments is halal)
I'm honestly waiting for serious answers insha Allah.

Bookmarks