Ambethvi uses a chainless report
Exceptional work done by brother Waseem, you have shown original book references with scan proofs and indeed those disrespectful statements are present in Deobandi literature.
This discussion should only take place between people who are well versed in deobandi literature, either Yusuf should come forward and prove that he has original books at disposal and he understands urdu well or he should accept that brother Waseem is doing a fine job ...stop using foul language Yusuf, the disrespectful words to Allah and his Prophet are unjustified and brother Waseem is right to refute it whereas you do not have any right to use foul language.
Here I have Baraheen e Qatiya in my hands Published by Deobandis themselves i.e. Dar ul Ishaat. On it's Page no 55 Ambethvi has used this following hadith:
Ambethvi said: [COLOR="rgb(139, 0, 0)"]Sheikh Abdul Haq narrates that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: I do not even know what is behind the Wall
[/COLOR] [ Baraheen e Qatiyah, Page No. 55]
I challenge all deobandis to prove this hadith, show me chain of this hadith, remember Ambethvi is claiming in this book that we need "QATI AND DEFINITE" proof in regards to Ilm ul Ghayb of Prophet (Peace be upon him) but surprisingly he himself uses a Mawdo and worthless report to justify his point.
After this Ambthvi says that Shaytan has vast knowledge and this is proven from Nass, where is the Nass for Prophet that someone tries to prove shirk?
AstaghfirUllah, look Ambethvi accepts nass for shaytan and does not call it shirk but in case of Prophet he rejects Nass and also calls it Shirk .. what a pseudo definition of shirk this is because Ala Hazrat nailed Ambetvi by saying that Shirk is same whether Isbaat is done for shaytan or someone else!
Yusuf or any deobandi do you accept the challenge of Ilmi discussion?