
Originally Posted by
Abu Marwan
You make an interesting suggestion that everyone should follow tassawuf. There is much to be said for the discipline. The problem I have with it has to do with the mystic claims for authority. An authority structure is fine, but the mystical claims of many orders have no basis.
I agree with you about politics and Islam. It tends to create an "Islamism" (that's an actual word in French) and reduce Islam to a political ideology. Once Islam becomes an ideology it can be identified as evil, like Communism and Fascism. This is the usual MO of the Islamophobic right. They generally insist that Islam is an ideology, not a religion.
Structurally, political and religious power has been separate in Sunni Islam since the days of the Rightly Guided Caliphs. The only exception is under the Mutazila heresy, when the state attempted to impose an official doctrine. Imam Ahmad resisted them, ignored them, refused to participate. Imam Malik, also ignored power. He wrote the Muwatta on a political commission but warned that it should not be used to impose doctrine through the state.
The Shias ignored the state completely and did not discover politics until Imam Khomeini invented the new doctrine of the Wilayat-e-Fiqhi for them. This is what enabled the Islamic Revolution in Iran, and nothing else. It was a huge innovation for them, but they hardly noticed. They are accustomed to such things.
I'm interested in politics. It's important for Muslims. But it's also important to remember that Islam is above this. States and civilizations rise and fall. Political ideologies succeed for a while, then fail. People who declare Islam as their political party today, will find something new tomorrow. It's best to give them a wide berth and hope they find guidance before events sweep them away.
Salaam,
Abu Marwan
Bookmarks