Ibn Taymiyya calling Taqlid Shakhsi a Deviation?

[dr.ati]

Not this line. From the sixth line from the TOP

Regards

The passage is much long and the right borders of the page are not clear.

[SUPERiMAN]

The passage is much long and the right borders of the page are not clear.

Never Mind.

[Nomadic]

I have got nothing better to do so will repeat the same for sake of sounding intelligent.

[SeekerOfGuidance]

Walaikum as sallam wr wb.

I just read that thread and the statement i made there was flawed when later on i confirmed it from some Shayookh.

Dr. Saheb, for you honesty and sincerity in accepting your error.

However, there are a number of statements that you have made on this forum, which appear very serious. Through husn ad-dhann, I personally believe you would not make such statements through your own ijitahad, but rather you have done taqleed of Salafi scholars who are generally prone to unearth, exaggerate and propagate lies and slanders that were dismissed by the Ummah long ago, and have remained buried since.

One example is your statement that the Jumhoor have regarded Imam Muhammad al-Shaybani, the teacher of many of greats of the Salaf, as a “Kazzab”. If you are not qualified for ijtihad, and are unable to back it up with clear daleel, with analysis of all the statements of the Jumhoor, then by your own standards you are not entitled to make such a judgement, nor mention it anywhere. Otherwise, you are guilty of the most horrendous slander that has spread through your efforts on this forum, and one which will inevitably come back to haunt you, unless your repent urgently.

Nothing less than detailed and comprehensive daleel should suffice yourself in making such a weighty judgement, and then to even propagate it. Please provide the detailed and comprehensive daleel that you have analysed and based your judgement on that the Jumhoor have regarded Imam Muhammad as-Shaybani as a “Kazzab” (flagrant liar).

[al_Zayn]

Dr. Saheb, for you honesty and sincerity in accepting your error.

However, there are a number of statements that you have made on this forum, which appear very serious. Through husn ad-dhann, I personally believe you would not make such statements through your own ijitahad, but rather you have done taqleed of Salafi scholars who are generally prone to unearth, exaggerate and propagate lies and slanders that were dismissed by the Ummah long ago, and have remained buried since.

One example is your statement that the Jumhoor have regarded Imam Muhammad al-Shaybani, the teacher of many of greats of the Salaf, as a “Kazzab”. If you are not qualified for ijtihad, and are unable to back it up with clear daleel, with analysis of all the statements of the Jumhoor, then by your own standards you are not entitled to make such a judgement, nor mention it anywhere. Otherwise, you are guilty of the most horrendous slander that has spread through your efforts on this forum, and one which will inevitably come back to haunt you, unless your repent urgently.

Nothing less than detailed and comprehensive daleel should suffice yourself in making such a weighty judgement, and then to even propagate it. Please provide the detailed and comprehensive daleel that you have analysed and based your judgement on that the Jumhoor have regarded Imam Muhammad as-Shaybani as a “Kazzab” (flagrant liar).

Maulana Sahib.