Can all this be refuted?

[NeednoName]

Assalaam'aaleykum!

I am sure members on this forum are aware of this hellish website. Content on this website has led so many people shunning Taqleed.

This horrendous website needs to be refuted at any cost. Here is the link:

http://www.*****************/tableeg...exposition.htm

[_SOD_]

is some other wrds suposd t b der in the place of the * , if nt the link is brokn

[_SOD_]

ooh i think i found the site

http://www.*****************/tableeg...exposition.htm

is it that 1? i think its new...the links on the side dont seems to b wrkin

[NeednoName]

ooh i think i found the site

http://www.*****************/tableeg...exposition.htm

is it that 1? i think its new...the links on the side dont seems to b wrkin

Assalaam'aaleykum!

Yes! That is the one.

[NeednoName]

Well, seems like SF has banned that website. I'll break it down so that link appears on the board. Just fill in the space you see in the link.

http://www.a l l a a h u a k b a r.net/tableegi_jamaat/exposition.htm

[godilali]

Well, seems like SF has banned that website. I'll break it down so that link appears on the board. Just fill in the space you see in the link.

http://www.a l l a a h u a k b a r.net/tableegi_jamaat/exposition.htm

salam,

Just from a quick glance, there is definitely some distortion and taking things out of context there. For example, Maulana Zakariyyah was merely trying to say that in order to interpret the Qur'an, one needs to master those 15 sciences, not that one should not try to read the Qur'an with understanding. Additionally, no one claimed that Rasulullah learn urdu at Deoband (an Allah's refuge is sought); this was just a dream that someone related.

However, some of the strange stories mentioned are probably found in those books; books of sufis are replete with strange incidences, which although you may believe to be karamaat, I feel that they are mostly khurafat.

[maneatinglizard]

That website it hosted by the Madkahlis, as far as I know.

Their consistent lies don't even need refuting.

[NeednoName]

salam,

Just from a quick glance, there is definitely some distortion and taking things out of context there. For example, Maulana Zakariyyah was merely trying to say that in order to interpret the Qur'an, one needs to master those 15 sciences, not that one should not try to read the Qur'an with understanding. Additionally, no one claimed that Rasulullah learn urdu at Deoband (an Allah's refuge is sought); this was just a dream that someone related.

However, some of the strange stories mentioned are probably found in those books; books of sufis are replete with strange incidences, which although you may believe to be karamaat, I feel that they are mostly khurafat.

Waaleykum'Assalaam!

Even I am dead sure that the author has done nothing but employed deceit in quoting and presenting the things. And these so called allegations are something that could very easily be refuted by knowledgeable members of this forum. But all this would happen if only we nudge ourselves out of our rut.

Listen, these are just 31 Points raised against the scholarship of our Akabir. Even if we tackle 2 or 3 a day, we would be done with complete refutation within week or so. And then it can be updated on a Blog which would cost us absolutely nothing.

I request members to pay heed to this cause or else let others fall prey to the deviants.

Assalaamu'Alaykum!

[NeednoName]

That website it hosted by the Madkahlis, as far as I know.

Their consistent lies don't even need refuting.

Waaleykum'Assalaam!

Whosoever they are, I wouldn't even consider them true Muslims. Because Muslims are not supposed to be Fitna monger. Hatred they spew is greater than the love they should spread amongst Ummah.

[NeednoName]

Here we have the first claim:

1. Do not try to understand the Qur'ân ever. Else, you will go astray. Fifteen “Uloom” (sciences) are required to understand the Book. (“Maulana” Zakaria Kandhalwi, Fazael Amaal, p.2)

Any Volunteer?