(comments from Shaykh Abul Hasan)
I listened to it all and he tried to be just initially but then his method of showing that Abu Usama had a basis to say that Imam Abu Hanifa was weak in hadith due the quotations that he started to mention himself only played into the hands of the likes of Abu Usama.
For had Dimashqiyya wanted to be absolutely just he should have not only mentioned the quotes but explained that most of them are not valid Jarh or themselves are of no validity. The latter was done nicely by Dr GF Haddad in his vindication of Imam Abu Hanifa, as it was also done in arabic by the likes of the late Shaykh Abdar Rashid al Nu'mani of Pakistan in reply to al-Albani.
I noticed that Dimashqiyya also got muddled up himself! He said on the 13th minute - 20th sec, that al-Kamil fil du'afa is by Ibn AQIL! This work is by Ibn Adi and he probably meant al-Du'afa al-Uqayli.. Also, 14min: 40 sec he said Dua'afa Ibn Uqayl - when it is known as Du'afa al-Uqayli.
He should have also said that a Jarh made a contemporary like that of al-Thawri on Abu Hanifa is not a dependable jarh at all!
Just shows that the man is not fully acquainted with Jar wa Ta'dil and so once again they have left the opening for pseudo-Salafi's to show how to weaken Imam Abu Hanifa and then at the same time play the game of having some form of respect for Imam Abu Hanifa. This is part and parcel of their anti-Hanafi agenda.