Major differences in four madhab's ??

[Usman]

So In you sight which one is the best. Hanbali or Wahhabi or Salafi

Assalaamu alaikum,
There are Ahnaaf(Hanafis) who are Innovators and there are Hanafis who have erroneous beleifs i.e. against Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah. Same goes for Hanbalis, if you follow Hanbali Madhab in your practice and have the aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah, that should suffice, no need to call yourself a Wahabi. In my view, adherance to the Hanbali school with the right aqeedah is all that should matter.

[Be_Muslim]

But I think Hanbalis are the part of ahle sunnah

[searchtrue99]

But I think Hanbalis are the part of ahle sunnah

I agree with you. This is true.

[shawn52]

But I think Hanbalis are the part of ahle sunnah

Yeah i am too agree with this statement...

[aslamjiffry]

IM a Shafii Madhab... Alhamdulillah........... and the all 4 madhabis are Ahlus Sunnah.............

[Mostakq]

Salamun alikum,
If anyone wants to find out which sect in islam is the best and right,he should look at the other sects of islam besides these four sects of ahle sunnah as prophet said that there would be many sects after him and only one would be right.

[Arfatzafar]

IM a Shafii Madhab... Alhamdulillah........... and the all 4 madhabis are Ahlus Sunnah.............

you're right.

[Arfatzafar]

Salamun alikum,
If anyone wants to find out which sect in islam is the best and right,he should look at the other sects of islam besides these four sects of ahle sunnah as prophet said that there would be many sects after him and only one would be right.

akhi, these're 4 madhab n not sect.

[Arfatzafar]

Bismillahir rahmanir rahim:
no doubt, ibne abdulwahab rh.a. Was a great aalim but he was not perfect. So he followed Hz Imam Ibne Hambal rh.a. If you go through the history, you will see that all Mohaddisin ikram rh.a. Were related to either prevalent madhab. But they weren't follower of them like us,the common men.
Taqlid of either mazhab is obligatory for all of us. Sometimes it looks awkward when we, due to lacking in deep knowledge of Quran o Sunnah n history, begin to criticize it. It is nothing but our ignorance. We can't prove any hadis sahih or zaeef until mohaddisin rh.a. Are followed blindly. See, what's taqleed ? Accepting the saying or doing of a ummati without asking for dalil is taqleed. Now think, what's is hadis ? It's is the doings of mohaddisin(authors) and sayings of mohaddisin (narrators). How can we say that a particular hadis was narrated by a particular narrator? Was the narrator Siqah?
Did our prophet s.a.w. Ordered us to follow Bukhari or Muslim or any other book ? Did our Sahaba Ikram rz.a. Followed these books?
Did our prophet s.a.w. Said that this hadis is sahih n this hadis is zaeef? This is the research of muhaddisin rh.a. which may be right or wrong.
If you say,we have usool e hadis to judge the ahadis. Then Q may be asked, who wrote these usul? Certainly they were also mohaddisin who wrote them. Which usool e hadis are followed? The same which came into existence after 800 years. So how n why these usool e hadees can be followed?
Bukhari sharif is the best n most authentic book after The Noble Quran. Agreed. But when it was said so about it? After 500 years!. So why this thought should be followed.? Bcoz We dont have any proof form hadis?.
Moreover, Bukhari was completed in 233 hijri, so which ahadis were followed before this period? Why we dont follow them? If you say all those ahadis are in sihah sitta, what's the proof? It's not corroborated with hadis?
These six famous books of hadis were denominated as sihah sitta in 500 hijri. Why we should accept it without authentic proof?. We believe in saying of muhaddisin without any authentic proof. Why?
Moreover, mohaddisin rh.a. have big differences. One mohaddis say 'this hadis is sahih others say-zaeef '. Is this not the fact. Mohaddisin rh.a. Had objections on 80/100/300 narrators of Bukhari, if it's accepted then, 18.60%/23.25%/69.76% Bukhari is zaeef from this point of view. During the Khairulqurun all ahadis were sahih. So brother without doing TAQLID, there is no way to believe in ahadis.
I dont regard Nasiruddin albani sb as a great mohaddis, rather, he had harmed the hadis. See, he had declared Tirmizi 26.70%, Abudaood 23.47%, Ibne Maja 23.70%, Nas'ai 10.34% zaeef. Now what's the guaranty that rest of ahadis are sahih ? Now any other socalled mohaddis may declare many more ahadis of sihah sitta -zaeef. Will you follow him.?
What Hz a'imma arba rh.a.or mohaddisin rh.a. say is quite authentic. We have to follow them as a Muqallid.

[Arfatzafar]

Assalaamu alaikum,
There are Ahnaaf(Hanafis) who are Innovators and there are Hanafis who have erroneous beleifs i.e. against Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah. Same goes for Hanbalis, if you follow Hanbali Madhab in your practice and have the aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah, that should suffice, no need to call yourself a Wahabi. In my view, adherance to the Hanbali school with the right aqeedah is all that should matter.

bro, so in your opinion ahnaf n hambali are not among ahlesunnat wal jamat.
Will you explain plz
1: what are the aqaid of ahlesunnat wal jamat
2; what about shafai n maliki
3: which sect your from