
Check out this hadith:
‘Isa (as), son of Maryam (as), will descend, rule for 40 years with the book of Allah and my sunnah, and die.
(Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Al-Burhan
fi Alamat al-Mahdi Akhir al-Zaman)
Isa(as) will rule by the Prophets (SAW) sunnah, thereby making him an ummati if the Prophet (SAW)

Muslims can't go and kill other people just because we disagree with them. Only khilafiat/government institution can carry mandatory sentences (after a public trial) and vigilanteism is never allowed. We can only use violence to defend ourselves should we are attacked violently. If you talk about splinter groups, splinter groups' actions do not represent the true Islamic teachings, so discussing about them would be pointless as that's not the practice of the majority sunni Muslims neither represent the beliefs of the Muslims.
Allah Knows Best.
لا إله إلا الله
محمد رسول الله

Sunni believes that Isa (alayhi salam) is a Prophet and Messenger, and he will come after the Prophet Muhammad (Sallahu alayhi wa salam).
But we refer to Prophet Muhammad (sallahu alayhi wa salam) as the Last Prophet because Isa (AS) was a prophet before Prophet Muhammad (SAW)...
So when Isa comes back, he won't be a new prophet after Muhammad (SAW) because he already was a prophet (SAW)...
Another thing is that we don't believe Al Mahdi and Isa is the same person.... We Sunni believe Al Mahdi will come back before Isa and prepare for Isa's arrival.... So this is why we reject the beliefs of the Ahmadiyya, because hadith indicate the Al Mahdi will come back before Isa....
I hope that makes sense.
Allah says, "Say, 'If you truly love Allah, follow me; and Allah shall love you and forgive you your sins." (3:31)


On one side you have a kafir who dibelieves, then worse than that you have a hypocrite who applies hypocrisy to the kalima then further worse than that you have someone who apply kufr to the kalima. The Qadiyyanis have applied kufr to the kalima.
If you are sincere listen to the Qur'an and make an effort to understand the Qur'an, the matter of false prophets is clear.
Reach out to the Qur'an and the Qur'an will reach out to you.
''Muhammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allah and last of the prophets. And ever is Allah , of all things, Knowing.'' 33:40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2qpnWDWrsU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Dvp7xQib-4

Here's a beautiful quotation from the wiki on khatamul nabiyyin;
"Fakhr al-Din al-Razi also known as Fakhruddin Razi or Imam Razi, was a Persian polymath: a Sunni Islamic theologian of the Ash'ari school, Islamic legal scholar of the Shafi`i school, Madrasah professor, and expert in a wide variety of disciplines, including the traditional Islamic fields of Sharia law, Fiqh jurisprudence, Islamic literature, Tafsir exegesis, Kalam theology, Arabic grammar and Muslim history; the Islamic philosophies of ethics and metaphysics; the formal sciences of logic and mathematics says in his Tafsir:
"He (Muhamad) is the last Prophet, if another Prophet has to come after the previous one, than an incomplete mission of Laws and teachings is left by the previous one, which is to be completed by the next one. But if no messenger has to come after the previous than he is very generous towards his people and he gives them a complete set of directions and rules(till the end of times), it is just like that father who knows that after him there is no one to take care of his child.""
Baira, it's a contradiction to say that you belief in the Quran which states explicitly about Prophet Muhamadas khatamul nabiyyin, yet to accept another "nabi" after him.
لا إله إلا الله
محمد رسول الله



Salam
there are cases of early Qadianies being killed by muslims for their beliefs. the reason being that those individuals used to be muslim were attracted to mirza ghulam ahmed qadiani (he had many qualities that may have seemed positive at the time) and then when he started making his outlandish kufr claims these people stayed with him, and beleived them, thus leaving the fold of islam.
the status of a murtad before the shariah is well known, and how hanafi dealt with murtads is no new thing. the same thing happened with early sikhs who were "ex-muslims", albeit nominal muslims.
dealing with those who were born into this kufr is a different issues obviously, as they are not murtad.
Bookmarks