

has sheikh yusuf ludhianvi's 'tohfa-e-qadianiyat' (Gift to Qadianis) been translated in English?
Recite Durood every time you read this.
Pen and Sword – is there a choice anymore?
My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/Reachingout2theleft
Do not distort the Name of Allah 'Al - Wahhab' just to mock the teachings of Sh. Mohammad ibn Abdul Wahhab.

It's correct but not representation of complete story...
They believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the fulfillment of the prophecy of Return of ISA (alayhi Salam)... So they only believe he is a prophet because they believe he is ISA... And ISA is a prophet by consensus...
To me it seems better trying to prove that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is not the return of ISA than to prove he is not a prophet... Because that is root of their misguidance.... Concerning this issue...
Allah says, "Say, 'If you truly love Allah, follow me; and Allah shall love you and forgive you your sins." (3:31)

So will he be a prophet or just an Ummati of the Holy Prophet saw?
لا مهدي إلا عيس - There is no Mahdi except ‘Isa. [Sunah Ibn Maja. 35.24]
No, we don't...we translate it like you wrote it, nameuser.... with 'Seal' and not 'Last'...
Yes.
Leave the rest to Allah....you can never be 100% sure that you are right/wrong...these 'tools' should help you to become a good muslim and live an appropriate life and not to judge others.
لا مهدي إلا عيس - There is no Mahdi except ‘Isa. [Sunah Ibn Maja. 35.24]
@byellow200: If I want to know about Sunnis I go to their forum and ask, to make sure that the information i get is right. The same applies to Ahmadiyyat, if I want to expand my knowledge about it I don't copy paste from a Sunni website...
'When you judge another, you do not define them, you define yourself.' ~ Wayne Dyer


'Isawill not be returning in a prophetic capacity because whenever prophets have been present, they have led the ummah, but when 'Isa
returns, he won't be a prophet with an ummah but an ummati and will follow Imam Mahdi.
As for your citing of that narration (whose Arabic is incorrect because it reads "There is no Mahdi except Eees" not 'Isa):
Here's the correct narration: لا مهدي إلا عيسى
It is an extremely weak narration, with some ulama saying that it is fabricated. And these ulama did so before the dajjal Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was born so it wasn't even a political reaction. Furthermore, even those that do not call it fabricated but agree to its weakness say that it refers to the meaning of مهدي , which is perfectly guided. The ahadeeth about 'Isareturning as well as the mention that the Mahdi is a separate person from the lineage of Fatima
are more correct and rigorously authenticated in comparison to this extremely weak hadeeth. It is part of Islam to not derive matters of aqaaid and belief from extremely weak narrations and if a narration is completely fabricated, it is to be thrown in the bin. The narration you're repeating is one hovering over the bin at best.
'Isadid not have any children so he cannot be related by lineage to Rasoolullah
. We all know that the Mahdi will be a member of the Ahlul Bait.
This is like saying we can never be sure that Qur'an is 100% right or wrong. We are 100% sure that the Qur'an is right and that Qadianism is wrong.Leave the rest to Allah....you can never be 100% sure that you are right/wrong...these 'tools' should help you to become a good muslim and live an appropriate life and not to judge others.
The Qur'an testifies against Qadianism - I even pasted the image before that says that Rasoolullahis the last prophet - no ifs, ands, or buts since the Arabic is extremely clear. I'll paste it again:
(once again, this is from the Qaloon mushaf and it clearly states that he is the "LAST of the prophets").
The tools are given to us to judge between good and evil because we are commanded to command the good and forbid the evil -الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر. So, despite all your attempts to make Islam equal to Christianity, the Qur'an, once again, is speaking against you. In Christianity, sure, you can leave the judging to God and let evils and fitan run rampant throughout society. But, that is not Islam. In Islam, we are commanded to stop evil with our hands. If not with our hands, then with our tongues. If not our tongues, then we have to hate it in our hearts and that is the weakest of imaan. So, it is not just praiseworthy, but obligatory upon all Muslims to defend the honour of Islam and Rasoolullah. So, anyone who claims that Islam is something that it isn't will be responded to and will be exposed.
Also, brother IbnIsmail said something that you failed to respond to:
What do you have to say to this?Rasoolullahmade Takfir of Musailamah al Kadhab who was making the same claim as Mirza Ghulam Ahmed al Kadhab.
ياايها الذين امنوا اذكروا الله ذكرا كثيرا


Bookmarks