Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 84

Thread: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Posts
    17

    Default Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Which of the fatwa sites is better, al ifta that is certified by the Saudi government or Islam QA which is banned in Saudiyya??


  2. "How To Begin Reading And Understanding An Arabic Book in 21 Days"

  3. #2
    Senior Member sabm90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    485

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Quote Originally Posted by yemenimuslim View Post
    Which of the fatwa sites is better, al ifta that is certified by the Saudi government or Islam QA which is banned in Saudiyya??
    Why is Islamqa Banned in Saudia? Can u plz provide any evidence for that?
    Dunya ki mehfilon se ukta gaya hun ya RABB,
    Kiya lutf e anjuman ka jab dil hi bujh gaya ho.!


  4. FREE postage anywhere in the UK.

  5. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Posts
    17

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Because the Saudi Government only lets a certain amount of scholars issue fatwas so that they are not conflicting for the people. And Islam QA's shaykh doesn't have permission from Al-Saud to issue fatwas


  6. #4
    Senior Member amr123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Posts
    10,388

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?



    Better to stay away from Islamqa website. Ghair Muqallid website. See this fatwa against Tableegh jama'at.



    http://*************/en/ref/8674
    What is the ruling on the 40 days and 4 months to the different part of world to call muslim brothers towards duties of islam.

    Praise be to Allaah.

    “Jamaa’at al-Tableegh” is one of the groups that are working for Islam. Their efforts in calling people to Allaah (da’wah) cannot be denied. But like many other groups they make some mistakes, and some points should be noted concerning them. These points may be summed up as follows, noting that these mistakes may vary within this group, depending on the environment and society in which they find themselves. In societies in which knowledge and scholars are prevalent and the madhhab of Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa’ah is widespread, the mistakes are much less; in other societies these mistakes may be greater. Some of their mistakes are:

    1 – Not adopting the ‘aqeedah of Ahl al-Sunnah wa'l-Jamaa'ah. This is clearly seen from the variations in the ‘aqeedah of some of their members and even of some of their leaders.

    2 – Their not paying attention to shar’i knowledge.

    3 – Their misinterpretation of some Qur’aanic verses in a manner that was not intended by Allaah. For example they interpret the verses on jihad as referring to “going out for da’wah”. The verses which mentioned the word khurooj (going out) etc. are interpreted by them as meaning going out for da’wah.

    4 – They make their system of going out for da’wah an act of worship. So they started to misquote the Qur’aan to support their system which specifies certain numbers of days and months. This system, which they think is based on evidence from Qur’aan, is widespread among them in all countries and environments.

    5 – They do some things that go against sharee’ah, such as appointing one of them to make du’aa’ for them whilst the group goes out for da’wah, and they think that their success or failure depends on whether or not this man was sincere and his du’aa’ accepted.

    6 – Da’eef (weak) and mawdoo’ (fabricated) ahaadeeth are widespread among them, and this is not befitting for those who aim to call people to Allaah.

    7 – They do not speak of munkaraat (evil things), thinking that enjoining what is good is sufficient. Hence we find that they do not speak about evils that are widespread among the people, even though the slogan of this ummah – which they continually repeat – is:

    “Let there arise out of you a group of people inviting to all that is good (Islam), enjoining Al-Ma‘roof (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and forbidding Al-Munkar (polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden). And it is they who are the successful”

    [Aal ‘Imraan 3:104 – interpretation of the meaning]

    The successful are those who enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, not just those who do only one of the two.

    8 – Some of them fall into self-admiration and arrogance, which leads them to look down on others, and even to look down on the scholars and describe them as inactive and sleeping, or to show off. So you find them talking about how they went out and travelled, and they saw such and such, which leads to unfavourable results, as we have mentioned.

    9 – They regard going out for da’wah as better than many acts of worship such as jihad and seeking knowledge, even though those things are obligatory duties, or may be obligatory for some people but not others.

    10 – Some of them audaciously issue fatwas, and discuss tafseer and hadeeth. That is because they allow each one of them to address the people and explain to them. This leads to them speak audaciously on matters of sharee’ah. So the inevitably speak of the meaning of a ruling, hadeeth or verse when they have not read anything about it, or listened to any of the scholars. And some of them are new Muslims or have only recently come back to Islam.

    11- Some of them are negligent with regard to the rights of their children and wives. We have discussed the seriousness of this matter in the answer to question no. 3043.

    Hence the scholars do not allow people to go out with them, except for those who want to help them and correct the mistakes that they have fallen into.

    We should not keep the people away from them altogether, rather we must try to correct their mistakes and advise them so that their efforts will continue and they will be correct according to the Qur’aan and Sunnah.

    There follow the fatwas of some of the scholars concerning Jamaa’at al-Tableegh:

    1 – Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz said:

    Jamaa’at al-Tableegh do not have proper understanding of the issues of ‘aqeedah, so it is not permissible to go out with them, except for one who has knowledge and understanding of the correct ‘aqeedah of Ahl al-Sunnah wa'l-Jamaa'ah, so that he can guide them and advise them, and cooperate with them in doing good, because they are very active, but they need more knowledge and someone who can guide them of those who have knowledge of Tawheed and the Sunnah. May Allaah bless us all with proper understanding of Islam and make us steadfast in adhering to it.

    Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 8/331

    2 – Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan said:

    Going out for the sake of Allaah does not refer to the kind of going out that they mean nowadays. Going out for the sake of Allaah means going out to fight. What they call going out nowadays is a bid’ah (innovation) that was not narrated from the salaf.

    Going out to call people to Allaah cannot be limited to a certain number of days, rather one should call people to Allaah according to one's abilities, without limiting that to a group or to forty days or more or less than that.

    Similarly the daa’iyah must have knowledge. It is not permissible for a person to call people to Allaah when he is ignorant. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

    “Say (O Muhammad): This is my way; I invite unto Allaah (i.e. to the Oneness of Allaah — Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge”

    [Yoosuf 12:108]

    i.e., with knowledge, because the caller must know that to which he calls people, what is obligatory, mustahabb, haraam and makrooh. He has to know what shirk, sin, kufr, immorality and disobedience are; he has to know the degrees of denouncing evil and how to do it.

    The kind of going out that distracts people from seeking knowledge is wrong, because seeking knowledge is an obligation, and it can only be achieved by learning, not by inspiration. This is one of the misguided Sufi myths, because action without knowledge is misguidance, and hoping to acquire knowledge without learning is an illusion.

    From Thalaath Mihaadaraat fi’l-‘Ilm wa’l-Da’wah.

    And Allaah knows best.
    Islam Q&A




    I hope the mods block islamqa links in the forum too.
    Role of Imam Nawawi in Shafi'i Madhab: http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...Usool-and-Fiqh


  7. #5
    Senior Member amr123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Posts
    10,388

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Role of Imam Nawawi in Shafi'i Madhab: http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...Usool-and-Fiqh


  8. #6
    Senior Member Acacia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Gender
    Sister
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,383

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Quote Originally Posted by amr123 View Post
    JazakAllah


  9. #7
    Senior Member muslima1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Gender
    Sister
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    184

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    what about the webpage sunnipath? I can't even read Islam qa because the english used is so awful and I think the scholar is sexist.


  10. #8
    Senior Member amr123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Posts
    10,388

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Quote Originally Posted by muslima1234 View Post
    what about the webpage sunnipath?
    I think Sunnipath is good. Except for a few 'in-depth' issues, which we laymen won't understand anyway.
    Also visit askimam.org , http://daruliftaa.net (its not same as 'Al ifta' website mentioned in the OP).
    Role of Imam Nawawi in Shafi'i Madhab: http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...Usool-and-Fiqh


  11. #9
    Senior Member muslima1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Gender
    Sister
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    184

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Quote Originally Posted by amr123 View Post
    I think Sunnipath is good. Except for a few 'in-depth' issues, which we laymen won't understand anyway.
    Also visit askimam.org , http://daruliftaa.net (its not same as 'Al ifta' website mentioned in the OP).
    Do those sites allow women to drive? Islam qa is against women driving and I find the whole site sexist


  12. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    938

    Default Re: Al Ifta vs Islam QA?

    Quote Originally Posted by muslima1234 View Post
    Do those sites allow women to drive? Islam qa is against women driving and I find the whole site sexist
    even if one disagrees with a certain scholar's opinions using terms such as "sexist" is unfair to describe them. just because we disagree with someone is no excuse to use degrading terms for them.

    scholars issue opinions to the best of their ability, for the benefit of the populace, and shaykh salih al-munajjadis a good scholar, not withstanding differences i would have with him over the typical fiqh issues and taqleed. it is the job of a scholar to stand up for what they believe is the most correct opinion and present it to the populace, even if the opinion is unpopular.

    besides if i can remember islamqa doesn't condemn women driving as being haram however it does not condemn saudi for having that law (these are two different issues) and of course encourages women to follow the law when in saudi.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •