Warning: Lies, distortions, and slanders by Shaykh GF Haddad

[Bugz]

Who is this sheikh, nope don't know him.

[abul_hussain]

I love Shaykh GF Haddad... I haven't come across a scholar that I don't disagree with nor a scholar that is free of mistakes... He has done alot in bringing to light the mistakes and errors of salafism, al hamdullah... For this alone... I love him.... May Allah give him long life and a sit next to the anbiya in jannah... Amin.....

Are there any scholars you know of that has never made mistakes???

Why don't you love Barelwis and Ahbash ? they have done more in bashing salafis than Dr GF Haddad who at many times sided with Salafis like on the issue of Aqida of Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani and use of Bi-Dhat.

[aMuslimForLife]

Why don't you love Barelwis and Ahbash ? they have done more in bashing salafis than Dr GF Haddad who at many times sided with Salafis like on the issue of Aqida of Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani and use of Bi-Dhat.

I don't really know who the barelwis are and to be honest I don't really care who they are... And the Ahbash are a little extreme in their anti-athropomorphism approach... They make takfir of Salafis... while I do not agree with the Salafis and their minhaj... I don't feel Salafis are kafiroon (disbelievers)... They are Muslims al hamdullah... While they have mistakes and errors in their minhaj.... to be honest... I haven't met a Muslim who is free from mistakes or errors including myself. With that being said... may Allah forgive all of us for our short comings and misunderstandings and grant all of us jannah.... Amin...

[Ibrahimhanifa]

[QUOTE=Abu_Tamim;758061]GF Haddad said: "It is also a remarkable revision of history to represent Ismā.īl Dihlawī as a reviver of jihād. In reality, he was a rebel bāghī who opposed the jihād against the British declared by the last Mughāl Sultan of India."

salam

quick question dear brother, where can get this quote from, so it goes back to GF Haddad?

[Ibrahimhanifa]

"NOTE: Ulama and moderators were consulted before posting this."

Salam

Just wondering when you are planning to name ullemas who approved 'your comments?' . if i don't hear from you, can i assume you don't know yourself where the info came from, long as it shows GF Haddad got it wrong.

[Muzzammil Husayn]

GF Haddad said: "It is also a remarkable revision of history to represent Ismā.īl Dihlawī as a reviver of jihād. In reality, he was a rebel bāghī who opposed the jihād against the British declared by the last Mughāl Sultan of India."

salam

quick question dear brother, where can get this quote from, so it goes back to GF Haddad?

Last page of this: http://mac.abc.se/~onesr/d/tqi_e.pdf

[mh16388]

4. GF Haddad said: "The night of the Mawlid Sharif is of greater significance and merit than Laylat al-Qadr which is the position of some of the Maliki Imams as cited by Abu al-`Abbas al-Wansharisi (d. 914) in his encyclopdia of Maliki fatwas titled _al-Mi`yar al-Mu`rab wa al-Jami` al-Mughrib fi Fatawa Ahl Ifriqya wa al-Andalus wa al-Maghrib (11:280-285)."

"Some" normally means "more than one," but this encyclopaedia only cites one person stating this view.

i think what sh. GF Haddad meant was that Abu al-`Abbas al-Wansharisi mentioned the maliki scholars holding this view in his encyclopedia. not that he himself stated this.

Allahualam.

[Muzzammil Husayn]

i think what sh. GF Haddad meant was that Abu al-`Abbas al-Wansharisi mentioned the maliki scholars holding this view in his encyclopedia. not that he himself stated this.

Allahualam.

Al-Wansharisi only mentions one Maliki scholar - in the singular, not scholars in the plural - holding this view, namely Abu 'Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Marzuq. Whereas GF Haddad suggested that he cited more than one. And that was the point.

[mh16388]

Al-Wansharisi only mentions one Maliki scholar - in the singular, not scholars in the plural - holding this view, namely Abu 'Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Marzuq. Whereas GF Haddad suggested that he cited more than one. And that was the point.

ok for the clarification. maybe this extra detail and the name of Abu 'Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Marzuq could be added to the OP

btw does one mailiki scholar believing in this goes against the consensus of the belief regarding comparison between l\mawlid un nabi and laylat ul qadr?or is there no consensus?just asking.

[SeekerOfGuidance]

"NOTE: Ulama and moderators were consulted before posting this."

Salam

Just wondering when you are planning to name ullemas who approved 'your comments?' . if i don't hear from you, can i assume you don't know yourself where the info came from, long as it shows GF Haddad got it wrong.

The sample of deception and lies were gathered from posts by Muzammil Husayn, which were already on this forum such as those found in the following threads:

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...n%26%238207%3B

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...-Mawlid/page10

http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/show...-Shah-Kashmiri

You don't need to be a scholar to be able to notice the clear deception perpetrated by this scholar.

If a scholar was produce multiple slanders against your father by making statements such as:

"..he was a rebel bāghī who opposed the jihād against the British declared by the last Mughāl Sultan of India."

and you know that your father did not even live during the Sultan's reign, would you really need much intellect to decipher that this is a clear slander, worthy of outrage, and that this sort of pseudo-scholar needs to be warned against?

Unfortunately, Shah Ismail Shaheed is not the only victim of such slanders.

Nevertheless, before creating a new thread, posting material already produced on this forum, I thought it prudent to check with some scholars and moderators first. I don't need to name who I consulted.

Our bias and unjustness becomes undeniably clear when we are willing to accept unhesistantly, without verification, lies that are conducive to our tastes, and when the the falsity of such lies are exposed, we overlook such deception frighteningly easily, hardly batting an eyelid. On the other hand, the slightest slip by a 'wahhabi' scholar is treated with outrage, and used to paint all such scholars with the same brush.