How Hanafi and Hanbali fiqhs differ in principle?

[gulshan]

I was really interested about the differences among different Madhab or Schools of Fiqh. But almost everywhere, differences described among different Madhabs are difference of procedures of various amaals, not difference of principle. I would like to know the basic differences of principles between Hanafi and Hanbali fiqh. But no problem to discuss methodologies of other Madhabs.

[mohtashims]

I was really interested about the differences among different Madhab or Schools of Fiqh. But almost everywhere, differences described among different Madhabs are difference of procedures of various amaals, not difference of principle. I would like to know the basic differences of principles between Hanafi and Hanbali fiqh. But no problem to discuss methodologies of other Madhabs.

Brother, Are you talking about the differences in "Usool" between Hanafi and Hamble Mazhab ? "Usool" is more commonly used here if you meant the same.

[Caliph]

What do you mean? Like wudhu diffrences, eating diffrences, beard size diffrences, prayer diffrences, Asr time diffrences? You know, there is plenty of diffrence, but all the fundamental things are equal. I recommend you study the madhab itself instead of diffrences.

[gulshan]

Yes, I am talking about the difference in "usool" of these madhabs.

[Abu Zakariya Yahya]

Yes, I am talking about the difference in "usool" of these madhabs.

Yes to who? You said yes, to Caliph when he was talking about Furoo'...

Are you talking about issues related to worship, like prayer, zakat, hajj..

Are you talking about issues related to Usool al fiqh, in how they both extract rulings from Islamic sources?

Or what are you talking about?

[mohtashims]

Yes to who? You said yes, to Caliph when he was talking about Furoo'...

Are you talking about issues related to worship, like prayer, zakat, hajj..

Are you talking about issues related to Usool al fiqh, in how they both extract rulings from Islamic sources?

Or what are you talking about?

I think he and me are looking for this

---> Are you talking about issues related to Usool al fiqh, in how they both extract rulings from Islamic sources?

However, I guess gulshan can confirm.

[gulshan]

---> Are you talking about issues related to Usool al fiqh, in how they both extract rulings from Islamic sources?

You are right brother. I wanted to know- "How the methodology of extracting sharii rulings differs between the two madhabs?"

[gulshan]

Anyone with an answer?

[haseeb ahmad hanbali]

you should study "Musnad Imam ahmad bin hanbal (r.h)"

[Abu Zakariya Yahya]

you should study "Musnad Imam ahmad bin hanbal (r.h)"

That has nothing to do with Hanbali Usool Al-Fiqh.

If anything he should read an introduction to the Hanbali Madhab, or one explaining it's usool, there is one by ِAbdullah bin Abdul Muhsin bin Turki, Ibn Badraan, or Bakr Abu Zaid just to name a few.

If I have time I'll write something short.