Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46

Thread: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    D.C.
    Posts
    351

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?


    Isn't dancing totally prohibited in our [Hanafi] Madhhab?


  2. "How To Begin Reading And Understanding An Arabic Book in 21 Days"

  3. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Maliki
    Posts
    853

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Arif2 View Post

    Isn't dancing totally prohibited in our [Hanafi] Madhhab?
    yep, but not whirling whilst doing dhikr according to some Ottoman jurists.


  4. FREE postage anywhere in the UK.

  5. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    None
    Posts
    670

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by AbdurRaheem2 View Post
    yep, but not whirling whilst doing dhikr according to some Ottoman jurists.
    السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته و مغفرته

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    Dancing is permissible in another case. A wife is allowed to dance for her husband provided there is no music and provided it is does not resemble inappropriate non-muslim dancing such as lap dancing, this does not however include seductive dancing which is permissible. This is taken from Mufti Muhammad ibn Adam Al-Kawthari's book Islamic Guide to Sexual Relations.


  6. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Remembrance of Allaah by the tongue, whether done silently, loudly, individually or in a group is permitted with its prerequisites and etiquette. However, the remembrance which some people enage in - wherein there is balanced and pre-arranged movements, simulated chanting with melodious tunes, jumping and leaping, skipping and enticing, lowering oneself and raising oneself, turning around suddenly and pushing oneself forward, running around in circles, striking the feet in order to coincide with the songs - sound temperaments remain aloof from all this and a submissive heart absolves itself from all this. Had the heart of such a person [who engages in these different forms] been a humble and submissive heart, the other parts of his body would also have humbled and submitted themselves - as stated by the great tabi'ee, Imam Sa'eed Ibn al-Musayyab rahimahullah. [The Sunnah way of the Sufis, p146, Zamzam publishers]

    At-Tinneesi rahimahullah says: We were sitting in the company of Imam Malik rahimahullah while his students were sitting around him. A person who was from nasibeen said to him: "We have some people who are referred to as Sufis - they eat a lot, they then begin singing qasidas and thereafter they stand up and begin dancing." So Imam Malik rahimahullah asked: "Are they children?" The person replied: "No." Imam Malik rahimahullah asked: "Are they insane people?" The person replied: "No. They are elderly people who are sane." Imam Malik rahimahullah said: "I have never heard of Muslims doing these things." [Qadi Iyad, tarteeb al-madarik, vol 2, p54; Ibid, pp 150-151)
    قادمون يا أقصى


  7. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Location
    A certain island
    Posts
    980

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by XTREME View Post
    don't ever say anything of you don't even know about the Aulia Allah!
    Brother, according to the criteria set in this forum, they are not walis. Most of them do not have any beards


  8. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Kashmir
    Posts
    1,339

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Abu_Dahdah View Post
    Brother, according to the criteria set in this forum, they are not walis. Most of them do not have any beards
    Do you know Allama Iqbal (RA) was a Wali and he didn't had a beard.
    He was a Rind according to Sufi terminology.


  9. #17
    Senior Member mh16388's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    pk
    Posts
    2,850

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by XTREME View Post
    Do you know Allama Iqbal (RA) was a Wali and he didn't had a beard.
    since when?
    Recite Durood every time you read this.

    Pen and Sword – is there a choice anymore?

    My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/Reachingout2theleft

    Do not distort the Name of Allah 'Al - Wahhab' just to mock the teachings of Sh. Mohammad ibn Abdul Wahhab.


  10. #18
    Senior Member mh16388's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    pk
    Posts
    2,850

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Abu_Dahdah View Post
    Brother, according to the criteria set in this forum, they are not walis. Most of them do not have any beards
    it is not just the beard. it is the complete adherence to sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH).
    Recite Durood every time you read this.

    Pen and Sword – is there a choice anymore?

    My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/Reachingout2theleft

    Do not distort the Name of Allah 'Al - Wahhab' just to mock the teachings of Sh. Mohammad ibn Abdul Wahhab.


  11. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Hanafi
    Location
    Kashmir
    Posts
    1,339

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by mh16388 View Post
    since when?
    Read Zinda Rood by Javed Iqbal s/o Allama Iqbal


  12. #20
    Senior Member aMuslimForLife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Gender
    Brother
    Madhhab
    Shafi'i
    Posts
    452

    Default Re: Whirling Dervishes a waste of money to see as they are un-Islamic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Arif2 View Post

    Isn't dancing totally prohibited in our [Hanafi] Madhhab?

    Is Group Dhikr With Swaying Permissible?


    Answered by Faraz Rabbani

    Question: Is group dhikr with poetry and rhythmic swaying permitted? What about the narration of Ibn Mas`ud prohibiting it?

    Answer: In the Name of Allah, Most Merciful & Compassionate

    Yes, such form of dhikr is in itself permitted, as the verdicts of major Hanafi authorities make clear.

    Among the great scholars of the Hanafi school who have specifically permitted such an act are Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Kamal Basha, Imam Shurunbulali, Sayyidi Abd al-Ghani al-Nablusi, `Allama Abd al-Qadir `Isa—who cites proofs for it from the major Hanafi reference works, including Ibn Abidin—and Imam Ashraf Ali al-Tahanawi in his Imdad al-Fatawa (5.151).

    As for the narration of Ibn Mas`ud prohibiting group dhikr, it was discussed by Imam `Abd al-Hayy al-Lakhnawi in his book on the permissibility of loud group dhikr, Sibahat al-Fikr fi’l Jahri bi’l Dhikr, who stated:

    “This may be answered in several ways:

    First, while this narration was mention by a group of fuqaha, it does not have any trace in the books of hadith. Rather, what is authentically established from Ibn Mas`ud (Allah be pleased with him) is the contrary. Imam al-Suyuti (Allah have mercy on him) said in Natijat al-Fikr [his work on the permissibility of group dhikr out loud], This narration from Ibn Mas`ud (Allah be pleased with him) needs exposition in terms of its chain of narrations and who of the hadith masters transmitted it in their works, and I have seen evidence that would disprove its being established from Ibn Mas`ud. Ahmad ibn Hanbal transmitted in his Kitab al-Zuhd, that Husain ibn Muhammad related with his chain from Abu Wa il that he said, Those who think that Abdullah [Ibn Mas`ud] used to prohibit the dhikr! I never sat with Abdullah [Ibn Mas`ud] in a gathering save that he did dhikr in it.

    Second, even if this narration were established, it goes against explicit rigorously authenticated Prophetic hadiths that permit dhikr out loud as long as it is not excessively loud.[3] These hadiths are given precedence [over this narration] when their indication conflicts.

    Third, what al-Bazzazi mentioned in his Fatawa.” [Sibahat al-Fikr, 42-43]

    In his Fatawa, al-Bazzazi stated:

    “If he [Ibn Mas`ud] actually removed them from the masjid, it is possible that it was because they believed that it was an act of worship [specifically enjoined], and to teach people that such a belief is a blameworthy innovation.”

    There are also a number of hadith that permit group dhikr, such as the narration of Abu Huraryah in Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Nasa`i, and Ibn Majah, wherein the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

    “Allah says, ‘I am as My servant thinks of Me, and I am with him when he makes remembrance (dhikr) of Me. If he makes remembrance of Me to himself, I make remembrance of him to Myself. If he makes remembrance of Me in a gathering, I make remembrance of him in a gathering better than it.’”

    Imam al-Jazari (Allah have mercy on him) said in his Miftah al-Hisn al-Hasin, “This hadiths indicates the permissibility of group dhikr.” Imam al-Suyuti said, “Group dhikr can only be out loud, so this hadith indicates its permissibility.” After this hadith, Imam Lakhnawi quotes thirty nine other hadiths of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) that indicate the permissibility of group dhikr. (Sibahat al-Fikr 44-58) He then quoted numerous Hanafi authorities, including al-Bazzazi, Abd al-Haqq al-Dahlawi, Khayr al-Din al-Ramli, and others, who said group dhikr is permitted. [This is also the position adopted by al-Tahtawi and Ibn Abidin, the two foremost references for fatwa in the Hanafi school, and there is no consequential disagreement about the permissibility of group dhikr in the Shafi`i school; it is the recorded position of al-Nawawi, Ibn Hajar, al-Subki, Ibn Daqiq, Ibn Abd al-Salam, al-Khalili, and their other imams].

    Imam Lakhnawi concludes by stating:

    “As for loud dhikr, the hadiths permitting it are numerous, as are the reports [from the Companions and early Muslims], and we did not find a single proof clearly indicating that loud dhikr is impermissible or disliked. The hadith experts, Shafi`i fuqaha and some Hanafi fuqaha also permitted it.”

    In the end, it should be noted that when it comes to the legal ruling of a particular human act, it is our duty to see what the legal experts of Islam, namely the fuqaha of the four schools of thought, said about the matter. Any matter that they deemed permitted may not be criticized by the common person or deemed wrong, for they are the inheritors of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), and they fulfilled the duty of operationalizing the sunnah of the Beloved of Allah.

    Wasalam
    Faraz Rabbani

    (Edited by Salman Younas)
    Imaam Ash Shafi'i said, "Whoever wants Allah to give him good must have a good opinion of people." (Bustan Arifeen-Nawawi)

    My Blog --> http://baraka.wordpress.com


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •