pickyNothing on Latin America. Economic development should have shown a proper plan of action, Science and Technology was also shallow,
not surprisinglyIt reminded me of the ARAB LEAGUE communiques.
HE WAS A TURANIANIST BROTHER, HE WAS FOR TURKISM, WHAT DO YOU MEAN?The question here are:
1.has the OIC fulfilled the dream of the Turkish poet-philosopher (Ziya Gokalp) or the desire of the Muslim ummah?
DEFINITELY FALLING SHORT2.Is the OIC serving the purpose for which it was created?
MORE THAN NOTHING3.What has it achieved in almost three decades of its existence?
MORE THAN THEY GOT4.What did the ummah expect from the OIC?
MAYBE5.Was this expectation too unrealistic?
GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES I GIVE THEM A "C-"5.How far away is the OIC from its declared goals?
I GIVE YOUR ANALYSIS OF THIS AN "F"Most of these members would be more than happy to see Palestinians wiped out of the lands....
No that's not right his analysis of the OIC deserves at least a D or a -C not a fail, he does get some bits right. Change your post so it says D and add a note at the bottom 'could do better, should focus more on his homework'
Now Muslims are just like headless chicken
we have no effective leadership and all we think of is money and more money for ourselves.